Update 03-05-2025:Added more information on Intel’s Guadi 3 and corrected supported data formats.Intel formally introduced its Gaudi 3 accelerator for AI workloads today. The new processors are slower than Nvidia’s popular H100 and H200 GPUs for AI and HPC, so Intel is betting the success of its Gaudi 3 on its lower price and lower total cost of ownership (TCO).
Intel’s Gaudi 3 processor uses two chiplets that pack 64 tensor processor cores (TPCs, 256x256 MAC structure with FP32 accumulators), eight matrix multiplication engines (MMEs, 256-bit wide vector processor), and 96MB of on-die SRAM cache with a 19.2 TB/s bandwidth. Also, Gaudi 3 integrates 24 200 GbE networking interfaces and 14 media engines — with the latter capable of handling H.265, H.264, JPEG, and VP9 to support vision processing. The processor is accompanied by 128GB of HBM2E memory in eight memory stacks, offering a massive bandwidth of 3.67 TB/s.
Intel’s Gaudi 3 represents a massive improvement when compared toGaudi 2, which has 24 TPCs and two MMEs and carries 96GB of HBM2E memory. Intel did not simplify its TPCs and MMEs as the Gaudi 3 processor supports FP8, BF16, FP16, TF32, and FP32 matrix operations, as well as FP8, BF16, FP16, and FP32 vector operations.
*with sparsity.
When it comes to performance, Intel says that Gaudi 3 can offer up to 1,835 BF16/FP8 matrix TFLOPS as well as up to 28.7 BF16 vector TFLOPS at around 600W TDP. Compared to Nvidia’s H100, at least on paper, Gaudi 3 offers higher BF16 matrix performance or just slightly lower when Nvidia’s hardware uses sparsity feature (1,835 vs 1,979 TFLOPS), slightly lower FP8 matrix performance or two times lower FP8 matrix performance when H100 uses sparsity (1,835 vs 3,958 TFLOPS), and significantly lower BF16 vector performance (28.7 vs 133.8 TFLOPS).
More important than the raw specs will be the actual real-world performance of Gaudi 3. It needs to compete with AMD’s Instinct MI300-series and Nvidia’s H100 and B100/B200 processors. This remains to be seen, as a lot depends on software and other factors. For now, Intel showed some slides claiming that Gaudi 3 can offer a significant price-performance advantage compared to Nvidia’s H100.
Earlier this year, Intel indicated that an accelerator kit based oneight Gaudi 3 processors on a baseboard will cost $125,000, which means that each one will cost around $15,625. By contrast, an Nvidia H100 card is currently available for$30,678, so Intel plans to have a big price advantage over its competitor. Yet, with the potentially massive performance advantages offered by Blackwell-based B100/B200 GPUs, it remains to be seen whether the blue company will be able to maintain its advantage over its rival.
Get Tom’s Hardware’s best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
“Demand for AI is leading to a massive transformation in the datacenter, and the industry is asking for choice in hardware, software, and developer tools,” said Justin Hotard, Intel executive vice president and general manager of the Data Center and Artificial Intelligence Group. “With our launch of Xeon 6 with P-cores and Gaudi 3 AI accelerators, Intel is enabling an open ecosystem that allows our customers to implement all of their workloads with greater performance, efficiency, andsecurity.“Intel’s Gaudi 3 AI accelerators will be available from IBM Cloud and Intel Tiber Developer Cloud. Also, systems based on Intel’s Xeon 6 and Gaudi 3 will be generally available from Dell, HPE, and Supermicro in the fourth quarter, with systems from Dell and Supermicro shipping in October and machines from Supermicro shipping in December.
Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
