Intel has recently introduced two performance-boosting features for itsCore Ultra 200S(codenamed Arrow Lake) processors, which rank among thebest CPUs. WhileIPO(Intel Performance Optimizations) and200S Boostshare the same objective, oneBiliBili user’stests (viaUniko’s Hardware) seemingly show that IPO delivers a higher gaming performance uplift.

The user performed the tests with a Core Ultra 7 265K, DDR5-8000 memory, and aGeForce RTX 5090D. They benchmarked IPO and 200S Boost across seven games with different quality settings at 2160p (3840 x 2160) and DLSS activated when applicable.

Core Ultra 200S CPU

The Core Ultra 7 265K was a part of three configurations. The XMP configuration enables XMP to get the memory up to DDR5-8000 with no changes to the processor. The 200S Boost configuration increases the Die-to-Die (D2D) communication fabric from the default 2.1 GHz to 3.2 GHz and the Next Generation Uncore (NGU) fabric from 2.6 GHz to 3.2 GHz.

On the other hand, the IPO configuration makes several changes to the processor. For starters, it increases the P-core and E-core clocks to 5.4 GHz and 4.9 GHz, respectively, from the default 5.2 GHz and 4.9 GHz. While the 200S Boost doesn’t touch the Ring (3.8 GHz), IPO overclocks it to 4 GHz. These adjustments limit IPO from pushing the D2D and NGU as hard as 200S Boost. As a result, the IPO only dials in at 3.1 GHz for the D2D and NGU. The memory, however, is tuned to DDR5-8400 with optimized timings.

Zhiye Liu

263 / 197

269 / 197

274 / 198

288 / 260

289 / 261

297 / 277

103 / 87

104 / 82

110 / 89

200 / 101

202 / 102

206 / 104

484 / 403

483 / 396

491 / 405

653 / 205

661 / 217

770 / 260

146 / 111

158 / 116

170 / 127

IPO pumped out 2% higher average frame rates than 200S Boost inForza Horizon 5and less than 1% higher 1% Lows. InCyberpunk 2077, however, IPO exhibited 3% higher average frame rates and 6% higher 1% Lows. IPO also excelled inTotal War: Warhammer III, delivering 6% better average frame rates and 9% better 1% Lows than 200S Boost.

WithBlack Myth: Wukong, IPO only showed 2% higher average frame rates and 1% Lows than 200S Boost. The tests showed similar results inTom Clancy’s Rainbow Six: Siege.

Counter-Strike 2, tested at 1080p (1920 x 1080), gained the most from Intel’s performance enhancements. It is not unexpected, asCounter-Strike 2is very processor-intensive. IPO boasted 16% higher average frame rates and 20% better 1% Lows. Meanwhile, IPO outperformed 200S Boost inWatch Dogs: Legionwith 8% and 9% improved average frame rates and 1% Lows, respectively.

Get Tom’s Hardware’s best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Since their introduction, Intel’s Core Ultra 200S processors have exhibited performance challenges, prompting Intel to develop various optimizations to enhance their competitiveness against AMD’sRyzen 9000(codename Granite Ridge) processors. Nonetheless, user-providedbenchmarksindicate a comparative advantage for Intel IPO over 200S Boost. It’s understandable since the former makes more changes to the processor’s parameters and overclocks compatible DDR5-8000 memory kits to DDR5-8400.

As the results have shown, the performance margins between Intel’s IPO and 200S Boost are small unless you’re playing a processor-intensive game. For instance, runningCyberpunk 2077at 289 FPS or 297 FPS may not be discernible to the human eye if you don’t have a frame rate monitoring software on screen.

Intel’s 200S Boost is available to all Arrow Lake processor owners via a motherboard firmware update. Intel IPO, on the other hand, is currently only available in China.

FollowTom’s Hardware on Google Newsto get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Zhiye Liu is a news editor and memory reviewer at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.